The methods of multiattribute analysis were tested in many fields and applied to different disciplines as well as to solving many specific problems. In spite of these facts, multiattribute analysis is not sufficiently developed, the methods are not perfect, and scientists constantly raise the question, “Which is the best method for a given problem?” Most of the methods enable us to determine the priority rank for comparing the alternatives, not allowing, however, to establish the level at which one alternative can be better than another. The members of EWGORSDCE have created a series of new optimization methods, which were successfully applied in different fields:
 The COmplex Proportial ASsesment (COPRAS) in 1996 (by Zavadskas E.K. and Kaklauskas A.)
 Multi Objectives Optimization by Ratio Analysis (MOORA) in 2006 (by Brauers W.K. and Zavadskas E.K.)
 MULTIMOORA in 2010 (by Brauers W. K. M. and Zavadskas E. K.)
 Additive Ratio ASsessment method (ARAS) in 2010 (by Zavadskas E. K. and Turskis Z.)
 Weighted Aggregates Sum Product ASsessment method (WASPAS) in 2012 (by Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Antucheviciene J. and Zakarevicius A.)
 SyMAD3 (synthesis method of structural, technological and safety decisions) in 2012 (by Simanavičienė R., Liaudanskienė R. and Ustinovičius L.)
The successful cooperation between the stakeholders during the construction life cycle results a smooth flow of construction processes. However, the fact that construction environment is usually uncertain, unstable and therefore unpredictable should be taken into account. Technical solutions and managerial decisions made in such environment should be substantiated by proper methods, which let to process not complete and expressed in certain ranges (intervals) data. The correct methodological approach let to avoid unwanted disputes and other undesirable obstacles that impede the construction process and led to delays. To process the uncertain data expressed in intervals the members of EWGORSDCE introduced the modifications of earlier created methods:
 SAWG in 2010 (by Zavadskas E. K., Vilutienė T., Turskis Z., Tamošaitienė J.)
 Complex Proportional ASsessment method with Grey interval numbers (COPRASG) in 2008 (by Zavadskas E. K., Kaklauskas A., Turskis Z. and Tamošaitienė J.)
 Grey Additive Ratio Assessment method (ARASG) in 2010 (by Turskis Z. and Zavadskas E.K.)
For rational dispute resolution Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K. and Turskis, Z. in 2010 offered the Stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method. In 2008 a new logarithmic normalization method was presented. In 2006 FARE (Factor Relationship) method, allowing to determine the weights of a large number of criteria based on the relationship between one of them and the others was presented by Ginevičius R.
Uncertainty and imprecision involving multiple criteria, the intersection of goals and constraints could result the necessity to use the fuzzy logic in decision making. Fuzzy logic is an extension of the traditional logic to intermediate and approximate values that capture the meaning of words, human reasoning, and decision making. For multiattribute selection of an alternative under uncertainty conditions E.K.Zavadskas, L.Ustinovičius, Z.Turskis, F.Peldschus and D.Messing created and in 2002 announced the software LEVI–3.0 based on different methods for attributes normalization and optimal variant selection. The application of these methods increases the accuracy of determining an optimal decision. With new software it is possible to find solution of rational strategy problem using different methods under risk and uncertainty and to compare the results. To process the fuzzy data the members of EWGORSDCE introduced the methods:
 Fuzzified method of Complex Proportional ASsessment (COPRASF) in 2007 (by Zavadskas E.K. and AntuchevičienėJ.)
 Fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARASF) in 2010 (by Zavadskas E. K. and Turskis Z.)
By applying the methods of multiattribute analysis to different cases the authors of research papers noticed the regularities and pointed the statements that should be considered in further applications. For example, for the reason to make the efficient decision it is purposeful to use not large number of attributes including their weights. Considering the large number of attributes and ignoring their weights the less important attributes have high influence on final result. Therefore, the risk exists that irrational decision could be selected. Moreover, when the variants are characterized by large number of attributes rated in 10 points scale with the accuracy of calculation is 0,5 point, or 5% the attributes with significance less than 5% have less influence of final result than the values of possible errors and could be eliminated from decisionmaking matrix
The table below presents the brief information about methods created and published in year 2015.
Year

Method

Authors

Reference


New methods


2015

EDAS

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
Olfat, Laya
Zenonas Turskis

MultiCriteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), INFORMATICA, 2015, Vol. 26, No. 3, 435451.

New methods based on created earlier


2015

WASPASF

Turskis, Z.
Zavadskas, E. K.
Antucheviciene, J.
Kosareva, N.

A hybrid model based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection, International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, (2015) 10(6): 873888.

2015

WASPASG

Zavadskas, E. K.
Turskis, Z.
Antucheviciene, J.

Selecting a contractor by using a novel method for multiple attribute analysis: Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment with grey values (WASPASG), Studies in Informatics and Control, 2015, 24(2): 141150.

2015

COPRASSVNS

Bausys, R.
Zavadskas, E.K.
Kaklauskas, A.

Application of neutrosophic set to multicriteria decision making by COPRAS. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 2015, 49, 91–106.

2015

WASPASSVNS

Zavadskas, E. K.
Bausys, R.
Lazauskas, M.

Sustainable assessment of alternative sites for the construction of a waste incineration plant by applying WASPAS method with singlevalued neutrosophic set, Sustainability, 2015 7: 1592315936.

2015

MULTIMOORAIVIF

Zavadskas, E.K.
Antucheviciene, J.
Hajiagha, S. H. R.
Hashemi, S. S.

The IntervalValued Intuitionistic Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Method for Group Decision Making in Engineering. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 560690, 13 p.

2015

VIKORIVNS

Bausys, R.
Zavadskas, E.K.

Multiciteria decision making approach by VIKOR under interval neutrosophic set environment. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 2015, 49, in press.

2015

MULTIMOORAEXT

Stanujkic, D.
Zavadskas, K.E.
Brauers, W.K.M.
Karabasevic, D.

An Extension of the Multimoora Method for Solving Complex DecisionMaking Problems based on the Use of Intervalvalued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers”, Transformations in Business & Economics, Vol. 14, No 2B (35B), (2015), pp.355375.

2016

ELECTRE IIIIVIF

Shide Sadat Hashemi,
Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha,
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,
Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji

Multicriteria group decision making with ELECTRE III method based on intervalvalued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Mathematical Modelling, In Press, Available online 2015

2015

VIKORT2F

Ghorabaee, M. K.
Amiri, M.
Sadaghiani, J. S.
Zavadskas, E. K.

MultiCriteria Project Selection Using an Extended VIKOR Method with Interval Type2 Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14, 993 (2015).

2015

WSM modified

Stanujkic, Dragisa
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras

A Modified Weighted Sum Method Based on the Decision maker’s Preferred Levels of Performances. Studies in information and control, Art. 10 – Vol. 24, Iss. 4, 2015

2016

KEMIRAEXT

N. Kosareva
E.K. Zavadskas
A. Krylovas
S. Dadelo

Personnel Ranking and Selection Problem Solution by Application of KEMIRA Method, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2016, 11(1):5166

Hybrid methods


2015

AHP+ARAS+MOORA+MULTIMOORA

Lazauskas, Marius
Kutut, Vladislavas
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras

Multicriteria assessment of unfinished construction projects, Građevinar 67 (2015) 4, 319328

2015

SWARAWASPASNash equilibrium

Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz
Maknoon, Reza
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras

Multiple nash equilibriums and evaluation of strategies. New application of MCDM methods, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16:2, 290306.

2016

DEMATELANPCOPRASG

Liou, James J.H.
Tamošaitienė, Jolanta
Zavadskas, Edmundas K.
Tzeng, GwoHshiung

New hybrid COPRASG MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 2015

The paper “Recent development of the new MCDM methods under neutrosophic set environment” by E.K.Zavadskas and R.Baušys (see Newsletter 6 (2015)) presents a brief review of general concepts of neutrosophic set and new applications to multicriteria decision making.
Last update 08/12/2016

 Page administrators: